Katie’s parents never told her “no” when she asked for a book, which was the start of most of her problems. She has an MLIS from the University of Illinois and works full time as a Circulation & Reference Manager in Illinois. She has a deep-rooted love of all things disturbing, twisted, and terrifying and takes enormous pleasure in creeping out her coworkers. When she’s not at work, she’s at home watching the Cubs with her cats and her cardigan collection. Other hobbies include scrapbooking, introducing more readers to the Church of Tana French, and convincing her husband that she can, in fact, fit more books onto her shelves.
Twitter: @kt_librarylady
View All posts by Katie McLain Horner
Although you’re reading this on November 22nd (or later), this is the first library and censorship news post that I’ve drafted since the election, and it’s hard to see the headlines and know that the censorship in this country is going to get exponentially worse. I don’t have an answer, but I do know this is one of the most important fights we’re going to face in our profession. Read Kelly Jensen’s list of ways to fight book bans and censorship in 2024, make a plan to push back, and build in time to take care of yourself along the way.
Check Your Shelf Newsletter
Sign up to receive Check Your Shelf, the Librarian’s One-Stop Shop For News, Book Lists, And More.
Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.
Fairhope Public Library (AK) has created a policy that requires children 17 and under to have parental permission to access certain books. A city councilman said, “We’ve created policies that are to give power to parents, but do not step on anybody’s constitutional rights,” which is a heaping pile of bullshit. It’s still censorship, and it defaults to restricting access unless the kids have parents who are proactive enough to provide permission in the first place.
If you’re reading this newsletter online and want library news in your inbox, sign up for Check Your Shelf here.
